2The current research was conducted with the aim of compiling and validating the educational package of the 10th grade religion and life lesson based on Choice Theory. The research method for the stage of designing and compiling the educational package was descriptive-analytical method mixed . The main themes of the training package and the time required for training were taken from written sources such as the model of G schools and internal and external research projects. To validate the package, while using the face validity method, the content validity method was used in a qualitative and quantitative way. It was used with a panel of 14 experts. 14 experts were considered as the statistical population, 10 of them were in the field of psychology, two were in the field of curriculum planning, and two were in the field of education. In addition, two relative coefficients of content validity and content validity index were used. The minimum and maximum relative content validity coefficients for each item of the package were calculated as 1 and 0.71, and the content validity index in most sessions reached the number (0.85) for all goals in the educational protocol. The results revealed that the educational package of the Religion and Life lesson based on Choice Theory for 10th grade students have good formal and content validity and has the necessary validity for educational applications and research use.

The subject of this paper is reconstruction of public Choice Theory. The public Choice Theory, as the theoretical basis of modern political economy, has been criticized from different perspectives. This paper aims to find a way to redress the methodological defects of this Theory by putting the public Choice Theory in a structural background. In this paper, we have tried to introduce a combined theoretical system which is the result of the rational reconstruction of the public Choice Theory in Jessop’s strategic-relational Theory from the critical realistic approach.

Background and objective: Choice Theory is a Theory based on inner control psychology that believes the past significantly influences in our present life but it can’t determine our current behavior. Choice Theory explains that we, as humans, how to choose in order to get what we want. Due to the shortage of research about selection Theory in our Iran, this study’s aim was to investigate the effect of Choice Theory learning on the life quality and happiness in people who quit drugs.Methods: The current study was a semi – empirical research. The research plan used a pre-test and post-test plan with control group and two months follow up. Statistical society of this study included all people who quited drugs in Tehran in 2012. About 40 people who completed the addiction treatment program in addiction treatment center were selected by random cluster sampling. Then they were grouped in two categories by simple selection method as test group (20 people) and control group (20). Two questionnaires of life quality and MUNSH happiness scale were used to collect data. The selection Theory learning program was administrated in twelve sessions for period of 90 minutes for test group. The repeated measures MANCOVA were used to analyze data.Results: The selection Theory learning increased the life quality level (p£0.000, F=50.85) and happiness (p£0.000, F=573.05) test group in post-test stage. Also, the results has shown that over time the Intervention effect was a constant process in post-test and the follow up stages.Conclusion: Due to the importance of life quality level and happiness in people who quit drugs, the addiction treatment centers can help these people by learning the Choice Theory method to improve their life quality and increase their happiness after their addiction treatment.

In the present research, for the first time, the effect of the auditor's Choice of tax avoidance on the basis of Glaser's Choice Theory has been discussed. The findings of the empirical studies carried out using OLS regression on a sample of 173 active companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2008 to 2019 (1730 year-firm) indicates that the tax avoidance of companies with the right to choose The auditor is significantly more than the companies that do not have the right to choose the auditor. In general, the results of this study show that companies with the right to choose the auditor in their Choice of auditor take into account their own interests, including tax avoidance, and auditors are also trying to address the issue of re-election in subsequent audits. In order to obtain satisfaction through cooperation with these companies in the field of tax evasion, and in the absence of this flow, tax avoidance for companies with the right to choose an auditor is more than companies that do not have the right to select an auditor.